Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Affordable Brazilian Wax Mississauga

application decrees on business tax reform

A thorough Explanation of the new depreciation rules (not just GWG) with backgrounds you can find a an article by Dr. Oliver Voss, MBA, Frankfurt aM
  • "Corporate Tax Reform 2008: new rules on depreciation for low-value items - Entry into a simple depreciation accounting?"

    http://www.unternehmensteuerreform.de/media/Oliver_Voss_Afa_fuer_geringwertige_WG_FR_2007_1149.pdf
  • Sunday, February 10, 2008

    Food Items With Word Gold In It

    Recommended reading for the new depreciation rules

    The most important thing to trade tax reform, if it is relevant to teaching and training:

    trade tax rate:
    new: a uniform 3.5% for all legal forms



    business tax as an operating control
    (actually a change in income tax law) far: Trade tax deductible as operating expenses

    new: falls away, trade tax is no longer deductible , applies to all types
      basic allowance
    • :
    • remains unchanged.
    changes in the add
    interest
      until now only interest on permanent debt acc. § 8, No. 1; new HR of 50%
    • : all types of debt and capital raising, HR, only 25%
    • The popular tests in the calculation of current accounts falls away with it, as will no longer be placed on the permanent debt character.

    paid dividends for silent partner
    (also applies to pensions)


    so far: full additions

    new HR of 25%
    • rental expense and lease


    until now only for mobile u . etc. Goods not for land / premises; examine wr GewSt-taxation in the recipient and HR in the amount of 50%;
    new:

      plays Gewerversteuerung the recipient no longer
    • and real estate rents
    • HR recorded now:


    rents for movable assets: 5% additions
      rent for immovable property (especially real estate): 16.25% additions
    • payments rights assignments (especially licenses and concessions): 6.25% (excluding sales licenses)

    WARNING! these percentages are in § 8 GewStG not called, they result from the somewhat own formulation, which states that in the case group No. 1 (§ 8 No. 1): from
    1. a quarter of the sum ...
    2. (meaning each of the following Letters a quarter) and the corresponding
    3. in No. 1a to 1f, either nothing or once again a whole number, eg
    4. 1 d)
      fifth
    5. the leases and rental payments ... (Movables)
    1 e)
      thirteen twentieths position
    • the leases and rental payments ... (Immovable property)
    • 1 f)
    • quarter of the cost of ... (Concessions, licenses etc.)
    • The combination of the fractions is the above mentioned percentages.

    The percentages shown are confusing in Wikipedia, and the percentages there are still neighborhoods.

    allowance in the first part of the additions (§ 8 a No 1 to No. 1f)

    new: in the first part of the additions (No. 1 a to 1 f) an allowance of 100,000 €.
    This allowance is somewhat hidden at the end of the list
    ... where the sum exceeds the amount of 100,000 €;





    No change in the cuts.

    Melanoma Ribbon Tattoos

    business tax reform of 2008

    source of information for new business tax 2008:
    • less thoroughly
    • http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gewerbesteuer

    latest version of the law (here in complete form in a single HTML file)
    http://bundesrecht .juris.de/gewstg/BJNR009790936.html

    Friday, February 8, 2008

    Supercharged 427 Silverado Ss

    information for business tax in 2008

    One of the tax changes for 2008 relates to the voluntary surrender of income tax declaration in the hope of income tax refund. after two years
    submit (§ 46 para 2 No . 8 of the Income Tax Act). Only then could they get something back from the already paid income tax.

    This period has been dropped without replacement.

    The confusion starts now. For the "new" period is represented differently.

    According to a press release by the Federal Ministry of Finance and other popular releases on the Internet now have everyone who is not obliged to submit the tax return, up to seven years

    time for a tax return. The new deadlines are (from the 2005 tax year, it said (example:. Http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/lang_de/DE/Aktuelles/104.html) four years
    . The divergence as such certainly seems to be not quite recognize in Internet messages. It was only in personal Discussions with colleagues from the control region is seen the problem.
    enough right now for individuals to know that in 2005 the possibility of voluntary tax declaration - in hopes of tax refund - is still possible, otherwise apply if four or seven years has only played a role in the future. For training and practice but there is immediate need for clarification.
    Where does this difference in reporting, and from which is derived from the new deadline at all?

    Well, the answer in advance: the period results from § § 169.170 AO and the divergence of the differing views on whether to use the contact inhibition of § 170, paragraph 2 is.

    The two-year period was abolished following has emerged due to a constitutional challenge that this group of workers who must file an income tax declaration, but they can only give voluntarily, in contrast disadvantage to other taxpayers.
    The two-year period of § 46 para 2 No 8 Income Tax Act is repealed without replacement. There are no spare time limit of seven years, such a period of one seeks in vain in the Income Tax Act. It is now the same as eg self-employed.
    Here comes the fixing time limit for approval, which is responsible for all taxes and all taxpayers apply.

    If the self- no income tax declaration has to follow the tax office seven years in which the matter and if necessary to issue a decision estimate. This period results from the imposition statute of limitations, § 169 AO. After that will be possible after a certain period, called the assessment deadline, no more notice in this case, neither a first-time, another amendment notice.
    In order for the taxpayer and give no more explanation in the hope of getting a decision with tax refunds, because the FA must be under no more decision adopted.
    is the fixing period, apart from excise taxes and special cases
    four years (§ 169 AO)
    . It is based on the Origin of taxes. The creation date for each tax is regulated by law, the income tax is the annual discharge (2000 income tax arises at the end of the year 2000, ie on 31.12.2000, 24:00 Clock).

    In cases where the taxpayer previously had to file a tax return or should have, eg in the income tax starts, the delay is only furniture and interior of the tax return, to run no later than 3 years after creation, (so-called contact inhibition, § 170 II AO). If the self-employed from a tax return at all, come together seven years (three years starting suspension and four-year period). The Tax Office has
    seven years
    , to take care of the tax prosecution.

    The taxpayer may, if he subsequently files the declaration in that period, nor receive any tax refund, so it has its part for seven years, the theoretical possibility of realizing any reimbursement rights (this was the unequal footing with the above workers)

    This deadline calculation from § § 169.170 in the tax known training and belong to typical exam questions. The period of seven years is not a tax return deadline (this is for the income tax declaration requirement only 5 months), but results from the rules determining statute of limitations.

    Indirectly therefore the assessment deadline is a deadline for the workers, because after that period must not exceed the IRS on a tax return respond with a decision.

    In some of the messages you can also find this reasoning and the above calculation of "three + four years.

    Other terms of opinions, however, assume that the contact inhibition of § 170 AO II, in exception to the general rule is in addition to up to three years, applies here. The wording of § 170 II calls for a tax return must! Literally


    Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the fixed period, if


    No.1)
    a tax return
    or in a tax
    submit
    or a display to report
    is
    , at the end of the calendar year in which the tax declaration, tax declaration or the ad is submitted, but not beyond the third calendar year of the the calendar year following that in which the tax was created ...

    Since there is no tax return for voluntary taxpayer is not, strictly on the wording of paragraph 2 is applicable, would remain, paragraph 1:
      four years from the occurrence.
    • That would be the income tax with respect to 2005 the end of 2009 and of 2012. If you follow this logic, is questionable whether the legislature that has so presented. Perhaps he has missed the point, after all, it is known that he wanted to achieve with the abolition of the two-year period an income tax parity with other agents. Then there must be, as one colleague put it right, apply the § 170, paragraph 2 analog, to the legislature nachbessert the scheme.
      was in the official justification for Untenehmensteuergesetz I find no evidence on the subject. That the Ministry on its website itself laconically proceeds of seven years, although not mandatory, but it is an indication that is desired in the end a seven-year sunset clause.
      It is beyond the scope of this Article, demonstrate a solution. Rather, I want to point out where the ominous seven-year period is, and that haunt and why different messages here.

    Skin Disease Similar To Vitiligo

    What period is from 2008 to voluntary income tax declaration (application assessment)

    As part of the corporate tax reform in Germany in 2008 to introduce a flat tax in 2009 was decided by law. The tax is levied on income from capital (interest, dividends, § 20 of the Income Tax Act) and private capital gains. As always there is the problem for good information. The Google search is very tedious and takes many more or less superficial summary information from tax advisers or chambers leads. The rate is a uniform 25% in future, whether it is interest or dividends, and does not act as an advance, but does the taxation of that income in full.

    If less than 25% income tax marginal tax rate can begin the deduction of 25% in the annual tax return and is then charged with the personal tax rate.

    The change is accompanied by the elimination of speculation

    taxation for private gains (case group Other income, often called "speculation tax". These cases now subject to withholding tax, which can cause lack of periods, other effects.
    D
    he is off as far made in the capital gains tax by the distributing bank, etc., and the money is paid to the tax office. Halbeinkünfteverfahren

    will be replaced.


    Useful Links initial information:


    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abgeltungsteuer
    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unternehmensteuerreform_2008_in_Deutschland
    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki / Teileink% C3% BCnfteverfahren (part of the new income system)
    http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halbeink% C3% BCnfteverfahren (the previous half-income method)
    exporting a very technical article
    Business Tax Reform Act of 2008: final tax
    Friedrich Brusch, Hessian Ministry of Finance, Wiesbaden
    result http://www.unternehmensteuerreform.de/media/Brusch_Abgeltungsteuer_FR_2007_999.pdf
    The tax consequences for the various investment options
    by the so-called flat tax as of 2009 some significant deviations from current law.

    The Federal Ministry of Finance has put together an essay the effects, separately for the forms of investment, in a well done overview. The article is

    BMF:


    taxation at the various options, including assets, primarily investment under the Income Tax Law from 2009 to 2008 and taking account of the flat tax (flat tax tips)


    http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/cln_03/nn_298/DE/Steuern/Veroeffentlichungen__zu__Steuerarten/ Einkommensteuer/007.html

    Here are links to each chapter.


    concept of the flat tax


    shares / limited companies


    REIT shares


    investment units

    1. shares similar participation rights
    2. bond Similar Beneficiary
    3. typical silent partners
    4. Participating loans
    5. profit bonds / convertible
    6. financial innovation
    7. fixed-rate bonds
    8. Certificates (without warranty certificates)
    9. futures
    10. savings plans (without Riester contracts)
    11. endowment policies
    12. private pension
    13. Riester contracts
    14. basic services (Rürup)
    15. Leased Properties
    16. Owner-occupied homes
    17. Commercial closed-end funds
    18. Closed property funds
    19. Closed-end funds with investments

    Caribbean Garlic Soup Recipe

    The new flat tax

  • Introduction
  • Peter Burke, Attorney at Law , lecturer.
  • 01/16/2008
  • It is aimed at primarily at students and trainees in the taxation, in commercial areas (trade accounts) to all the teachers and professors who teach accounting or similar. Helpful is the article for those who must enter into business transactions practice or be recorded, whether they are surplus computer or use the "double accounting".
    Although the new regulations on the CCA since 1.1.2008 are already in force, trainees or trainers little useful information about the details, as they are needed. The many descriptions on the Internet are vague, imprecise, sometimes wrong (even on the part of tax advisers). Important relationships are all not explained.

    For teachers who are generally not tax professionals (exceptions are tax consultants who teach part time in adult education), is additionally the problem of how the issue could be presented quickly and clearly.

    In this paper, I assume that prior knowledge of CCA are available, so I can focus on the new regulations.




    The corporate tax reform in 2008

    accordance with common practice in practice I use in this paper, the abbreviation for GWG in the Income Tax Act defined "low-value goods."

    The rules were changed significantly by the corporate tax reform in 2008. The changes took effect on 1 January 2008.


    The original text of the law is hard to find on the web. The best place is the website www.bundesgesetzblatt.de can find non-subscribers access a read only version in PDF format. A reference would be the side http://www.bgblportal.de/BGBL/bgbl1f/bgbl107s1912.pdf. This includes in the "Federal Law Gazette BGBl I No. 40, 17 August 2007" contained in the section on the Business Tax Reform Act, adopted in August 2007, entering into force on 1.1.2008.
    This reform bill is not very helpful, it contains only the changes in the law, without explaining the context. Moreover, it is an article law, which instructs not the full text of the amended law, but only the changes to individual provisions of the Act. It reads something like this (here in the first section of the amendments to the Income Tax Act):



    § 6 (of the Income Tax Act, the author's note) is amended as

    a) paragraph 1 No. 5 is amended as follows:


    aa) in Buchsatabe a, after the word "is" a comma is inserted and deleted the word "or".


    bb) Under b be the set of a abschließnde point replaced by a comma and then the word 'or' and the attached letter C:

    "c) an asset within the meaning of § 20 para 2"

    b) paragraph 2 is amended as follows:

    ....

    Therefore, as usual, literature necessary to the scheme in the overall context prepared and explained. With the text of the reform law you can not work alone.
    be

    § 6 paragraph 2 and 2 Income Tax Act shall be applied to assets which purchased after 31.12.2007, produced or raised in the business property (§ 52 paragraph 16, sentence 17 ITA):

    Temporal application. On the year the company, it is therefore also not here.


    The Income Tax Act in its new version
    now is the result of the corrections, so the new full text of the Income Tax Act, prepared and published. You'll find the new version of the Income Tax Act (or applicable for 2008 version) eg on the Internet at

    http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/estg/__6.html
    The distinction to the previous version pushes the literature with the addition nF (new version) from the old version by the addition aF (old version). The relevant provision for the GWG in § 6 paragraph 2 and 2 is included. § 6 of the Income Tax Act contains the entire depreciation system and therefore the rules on the (in practice, so-called) GWGs.
    Extract from the Income Tax Act § 6 n. F.
    2)
    a
    The acquisition or production cost or in accordance with paragraph 1 No. 5-6 in lieu thereof value of depreciable movable assets of fixed assets, an independent use are capable, in the year of acquisition, production, or deposit of the asset or the opening of the operation discontinued entirely as operating expenses if the acquisition or production cost, less an excluding VAT amount (§ 9b paragraph 1.), or under paragraph 1 No. 5 to 6 in lieu thereof for the individual asset value does not exceed 150 euros.

    2

    A commodity is a self-use is not valid unless it can be used for its intended purpose of operating only with other assets in fixed assets and in the context of use inserted assets are technically matched to each other.
    3
    This also applies if the asset can be separated from the operational use of context and inserted into a different commercial use context.
    (2a)
    a
    For depreciable movable fixed assets, the separate use are capable, in the year of acquisition, production, or deposit of the asset or the opening operation, a single item form, if the acquisition or production cost less a excluding VAT amount (§ 9b paragraph 1), or in accordance with paragraph 1 No. 5-6 in lieu thereof for value the single asset 150 euros, but not exceed 1,000 euros.
    2
    The single item is in the marketing year of education and the next four financial years to resolve reduce profit with one-fifth.
    3
    separating from an asset within the meaning of sentence 1 of the operating capital of the compound item is not diminished.

    The changes at a glance to the term "GWG" nothing has changed (see Official Journal, in print from 1914). It's about "depreciable movable assets of fixed assets, an independent use are capable of "

    has changed, described coarse:
    The limit from the current 410 euros was reduced to 150 €, all is up to and including 150 € GWG
    The above values. up special treatment to 1,000 € and written off in the pool method at a flat rate 5 years
    All other values above 1000 € are, as usual, treated

    There is no right to vote anymore if you GWG depreciates normally or in the year of acquisition fully depreciates (not see it often) . GWG (and up to 150 €) must always be fully written off.

    The obligation for the separate collection of GWGs falls away

    The change relates only to the depreciation in the


      three separate types of income of the Income Tax Act
    1. , that income from agriculture and forestry, from business or from self-employment. Whether accounting is mandatory and you are charged by surplus account, no matter
    2. The amendment does not refer to
    3. depreciation in the other four types of income.
    4. are meant above all the advertising costs for employees ("income from employment") and for income from rental income. It remains here at the 410-euro scheme (GWG in cost to 410 €). The camera equipment of the newspaper editor is distributed so employed under the old rules to the years of useful life, unless they cost only € to 410, then it may be the year of acquisition of acquisition. It remains at the old CCA-border and in the choice between full normal depreciation or amortization.





    Past legal Until now

    Movable depreciable fixed assets worth up to 410 € described it as a CCA. They had a special tax.

    They could be written off in the year of acquisition. This has always been an option, the taxpayer could also choose the normal depreciation and distribute the costs according to the depreciation tables for year Eder life.
    It had a separate recording pass on these subjects. Therefore, keeping a separate account within the "CCA" has been performed, since it also equal to the record keeping was done with. On this account all the CCA were recorded, rather than to book into the appropriate accounts as fixed assets (machinery, vehicles, BGA).
    For purchases up to 60 euros was too much of the management effort. The income tax regulations (not the law!) Saw, therefore, that the record is no longer an obligation, which in turn caused that in the context of accounting these goods again treated separately. Instead they should be recorded on CCA, which of course was also possible they could also write directly or recorded on an expense account. Legally, it represented nothing more than ordinary GWG like all other goods up to 410 euros. The law itself does not know this limit.
    It was therefore:
    in the law:

    0-410 €: CCA; abschgeschrieben was full.

    from 410.01 €: normal Depreciation


    in accounting or in practice:



    00-60 €: Buy depreciable GWG, you did not have to book to the account "GWG"

    60.01 € to 410 €: GWG, the one on the account "CCA" or booked by several GWGs.

    from 410.01 €: normal depreciation, no CCA

      This rule still applies for the non-independent sources of income



    • Tips for teachers and authors
    • Do not make the mistake I see in many publications. There are often given the limits, without clarifying where the next field begins. Get used to formulate the boundaries clearer.
    • example
    goods whose acquisition value 410 € "
    not exceed
    "
    Thus, the usual laws formulations, confusing and difficult memorable. better formulation would be:
    goods worth "to
    including
    " 410 €

    or, if you want to call the area above: goods worth
    from 410.01 €
    .


    not correct, as illogical:

    to
    410 Euro: treating such and such
    • from 410 Euro: next level



    details of the new rules
    It relates to the write-back of "depreciable movable assets as fixed assets".
    first Limits
    A value up to and including 150 € to be the goods "GWG" as fully depreciated.
    At a value of € 150.01 up to 1,000 euros, the goods through a "pool operating procedures" for 5 years amortized
    A value from € 1000.01 to be written off completely normal.
    already here the problems begin for readers, authors and lecturers. Because whether goods worth € 150.01 to 1000 CCA can still be called, or intended to be unclear and not set by law. Accordingly, it is confused when it says

    "The CCA threshold has been lowered from 410 € to 150 €" and in the course of the text it says "GWG in the value of 410 to 1,000 euros ..."

    The confusion of tongues can also be found in numerous Chamber of Commerce publications and even in Wikipedia. There is clearly defined at the outset that GWGs are goods in the net purchase price to 150 € (as of mid-January 2008). In a later section states: "Low-value goods that are purchased after December 31, 2007, or produced, the amount of their purchase or production cost 150 €, but not 1,000 € are ..."

    One can not speak of a lowering of the threshold to 150 euros, while CCA from 150-1000 €, as this confuses the reader or learner. . This is not a problem, if one is about to become clear. The practice will have to remember, however, that the term newly defined or more clearly expressed in other ways.

    The law requires nothing here. So you could in the future of two species of CCA or CCA-stage . Speak
    • second Record keeping
    • deleted the record keeping requirement for GWGs (repeal of § 6 paragraph 2, sentence 4 and 5 of the Income Tax Act). The annoying 60.00 € limit lapses, as does the corresponding portion of the income tax regulations. All GWG up to 150 Euro can be charged uniformly, whether on an interim account GWG, or through direct write-off.
    • Because of the lowering of the threshold to € 150 will completely eliminate these special record keeping requirements. This applies both to balancing the end and for taxpayers to determine the taxable profit in accordance with § 4 para 3 ITA. In the complex EÜR so that such expenses should no longer be in the assets to be listed.

    third The right to vote

    GWGs must be fully written off in the future. There is no more right to vote (§ 6 paragraph 2 ITA revised)

    The previous option no longer exists. For the CCA to 150 EUR is the immediate depreciation will now be mandatory ("shall" instead of "may" in § 6 paragraph 2 sentence 1 ITA).


    Whether they are still on between books a special CCA account would be technically possible, most plans provide accounts but one account anyway "depreciation on GWG", which you will use immediately.


    4th Collectible items for CCA of more than 150 € to 1000 € (§ 2a Income Tax Act as amended)

    The new pool procedure: Movable depreciable assets, fixed assets with a cost of 150.01 € and up to 1000 have called into an economic year-related collection items (the practice " Pool ") can be set. This collectible item is over 5 years to write.
    Ew matters little above the article has a shorter or longer useful life. A device that is worthless after 3 years, but in this pool is so effectively written off over 5 years.
    As for shorter service life, it expresses the law this way: "If an asset within the meaning of sentence 1 of the operating assets of, the compound item is not diminished..








    The pool depreciation

    GWGs the second stage (from 150.01 to 1000) as said in a Pool summarized. In the release, one reads of the "Pool Solution" or the "group assessment".

    Each pool is treated as a single asset is treated and ready to write about a period of 5 years straight, regardless of sales, withdrawals or early impairment.


    depreciation rate
    One can also speak of a depreciation rate of 20%.
    No vote
    The pool depreciation is mandatory. This expresses the legislature, according to the usual legal language, the words "is to ..." from. There is thus a "mandatory group assessment"

    time Proportionate depreciation is eliminated


    The single item has the advantage that even in their first year must be no pro rata calculation of depreciation. Regardless of the acquisition date is given for the items contained in the collective assets thus also the first year is always a depreciation of one fifth of the cost or production cost.
    Statutory acceptance:


    Some time was questionable whether the pool of depreciation from the statutory requirements, assets shown in full (§ 246 para 1 HGB), corresponds.
    The Institute of Certified Public Accountants (IDW) has now given the green light commercial approach: The tax pool value is also recognized under commercial law, if it is of minor importance.





    computer and depreciation

    a very unpopular issue bim purchase of computer equipment was that practice and case law expecting that no peripheral devices such as a printer, scanner, keyboard or use his own, can thus be a priori no CCA (Exceptions: All-in-one or fax machine). The printer had to be written off Ormal, even if it cost only 200 €. This law is now more of an advantage ("blessing in disguise"), because most purchases are in the range of the aggregate assessment. For classification as a CCA they are written off in future mandatory for 5 years. Since it is not there supposed to belong, they can be in accordance with the depreciation tables will continue to write off over three years.

    Addendum:
    source of information for new business tax 2008:
    Business Tax Reform 2008: new rules on depreciation
    f r 􀀃 Economic 􀀃 low-ter - a simple introduction to
    depreciation accounting?
    Dr. Oliver Voss, MBA, Frankfurt aM
    http://www.unternehmensteuerreform.de/media/Oliver_Voss_Afa_fuer_geringwertige_WG_FR_2007_1149.pdf